There is nothing like inherent natural talent. It is just social exposure that decides one's talent.
Just imagine that we are capable of downloading human's memory in a pen-drive and transfer to another person's mind.
What will happen?
Someone, who never drawn a single straight line can become a great painter.
Someone who never jumped a narrow street drainage can become a great Gymnast.
Someone who was afraid of mathematics can become Einstein.
Talent is nothing but impact one's social exposure.Nothing natural, nothing inherent.
Social exposure, we cannot fully control its impacts on different people. The kids put in a similar class room, taught by same teachers get different grades, Reason? They are being impacted by so many other factors. At home, at play, by peers, by TV programs. So many other factors. Hence the differences.
But why kids born and brought up in a Hindu atmosphere become mostly Hindu? Simple. Impact of Social exposure.
But why kids taught in a same class room, by same teacher score different marks? Simple. Impact of Social exposure.
Social exposure decides some macro level but at micro level there may be individualistic differences. We control social impact but not 100%. That is why what particular exposure will make what exact mind pattern on anyone, it is not 100 percent predictable. It is not 100% fixed.
A data when uploaded to a computer is uploaded as it is.
But when uploaded to a human mind, it gets coloured by a human's pre-data.
That is a reason why we see different impacts of same social exposure on different individuals.
In the future, this pre-data and its impact will be managed and the results will become near to the perfection.
In a Hindu atmosphere, a kid become a Hindu but may not be Hard core temple going Hindu.
Further, with some more studied the same Hindu kid may become a Christian or an atheist or whatever.
Social exposure.
So, my conclusion is deciding factor is social exposure, not some Nature given, God given Gifts.
If Pablo Picaso was a great painter, he was only because of some special social exposure, surroundings.
If Einstein was great scientist, only because of certain social exposure.
If Rahul Gandhi & Bilawal Bhutoo are idiots, they are just because of social exposures.
Do you think nature does some discrimination?
Does nature makes somewhat better than the others?
In general not.
All kids are born Genius.
Just watch them and you may perhaps believe me.
In future, with the introduction of more sophisticated methods of data transfer to human minds, this is also a kinda of social exposure, we will see more controlled impacts. That day may prove a bane or a boon like every new technology science gives into human hands.
Beware!
Copy Right.
Just imagine that we are capable of downloading human's memory in a pen-drive and transfer to another person's mind.
What will happen?
Someone, who never drawn a single straight line can become a great painter.
Someone who never jumped a narrow street drainage can become a great Gymnast.
Someone who was afraid of mathematics can become Einstein.
Talent is nothing but impact one's social exposure.Nothing natural, nothing inherent.
Social exposure, we cannot fully control its impacts on different people. The kids put in a similar class room, taught by same teachers get different grades, Reason? They are being impacted by so many other factors. At home, at play, by peers, by TV programs. So many other factors. Hence the differences.
But why kids born and brought up in a Hindu atmosphere become mostly Hindu? Simple. Impact of Social exposure.
But why kids taught in a same class room, by same teacher score different marks? Simple. Impact of Social exposure.
Social exposure decides some macro level but at micro level there may be individualistic differences. We control social impact but not 100%. That is why what particular exposure will make what exact mind pattern on anyone, it is not 100 percent predictable. It is not 100% fixed.
A data when uploaded to a computer is uploaded as it is.
But when uploaded to a human mind, it gets coloured by a human's pre-data.
That is a reason why we see different impacts of same social exposure on different individuals.
In the future, this pre-data and its impact will be managed and the results will become near to the perfection.
In a Hindu atmosphere, a kid become a Hindu but may not be Hard core temple going Hindu.
Further, with some more studied the same Hindu kid may become a Christian or an atheist or whatever.
Social exposure.
So, my conclusion is deciding factor is social exposure, not some Nature given, God given Gifts.
If Pablo Picaso was a great painter, he was only because of some special social exposure, surroundings.
If Einstein was great scientist, only because of certain social exposure.
If Rahul Gandhi & Bilawal Bhutoo are idiots, they are just because of social exposures.
Do you think nature does some discrimination?
Does nature makes somewhat better than the others?
In general not.
All kids are born Genius.
Just watch them and you may perhaps believe me.
In future, with the introduction of more sophisticated methods of data transfer to human minds, this is also a kinda of social exposure, we will see more controlled impacts. That day may prove a bane or a boon like every new technology science gives into human hands.
Beware!
Copy Right.
No comments:
Post a Comment